Dr. Mandy Huggins

Thoughts, musings, and a little bit of education from a female physician in the Sports Medicine world.

How much contact is too much in youth sports?

I recently posted a blog about errant comments made in the sports media regarding concussion. After my sister read the post, she had a very valid question about contact sports in kids. Specifically, “How does an uneducated parent know what is safe for their young kids in sports?” She wanted to know if there is any way to determine how much contact is too much in youth sports. The answer to that? I don’t know. There is no good answer for that right now, unfortunately. However, here is what we do know:

Kids should be managed more cautiously than adults.

Kids may take longer to recover after concussion.

Kids’ brains are still developing, which may affect their short- and long-term recovery.

No protective equipment of any kind or cost can prevent concussion.

The long-term effects of multiple head injuries can be devastating – depression, anxiety, decreased reaction time, cognitive impairment, emotional lability, and so on.

Interestingly, a recent study out of Virginia Tech earlier this year investigated the level of impact sustained by youth football players (age 7-8) with the same technology used in studies with older subjects; it was the first study of its kind with youth subjects. Contrary to Derrick Mason’s comments, the study found that although these kids have a lesser body mass and play at slower speeds, they still sustained high magnitude impacts – impacts similar in magnitude (80 g!) to those in high school and college football. It also found that the higher impacts were sustained during practices, not in games like at the high school and college level. The frequency of said impacts occurred less frequently in youth football, but nonetheless, they still occurred. The results of this study prompted Pop Warner president Jon Butler to propose a rule change: limit the amount of contact drills to 1/3 of all practice time. Interestingly, after perusing the Pop Warner website, I was unable to find mention of said rule change. The website does make it very clear, however, that in Pop Warner there is an “absence of catastrophic injuries” and that the injury rate is a fraction of that of high school and college football. Well, no kidding! They also play a fraction of the time. That doesn’t mean it’s any less dangerous.

So, back to my sister’s question. Is there a way to determine if contact sports are safe for her kids? There is not. This is a tough situation. Even leading experts disagree. Dr. Robert Cantu of Boston University recommends that children under the age of 14 not play sports such as football, lacrosse, and ice hockey. He also questions whether kids should be heading the ball in soccer. On the other hand, Kevin Guskiewicz, ATC at the Unviersity of North Carolina, disagrees with that recommendation and instead advocates for safer tackling techniques. Clearly, more research is needed in this area. What is not clear is how to help parents make decisions regarding their kids and sports.

Bill Romanowski – a decade behind current concussion management

“Linebackers can play a little bit dizzy. Quarterbacks can’t play when they’re dizzy.” These are just a few of the rambling statements made by Bill Romanowski on 5/9/12 in an interview with Chris McKendry on ESPN’s SportsCenter. He made remarks in response to Cris Carter’s comments the previous day regarding bounties. Carter alleged that years ago, Romanowski threatened to intentionally injure him before a game. Romanowski denied the allegation but went on to talk about how intensely he played the game – in his opinion, it wasn’t a good enough hit if he didn’t end up with dizziness or seeing stars. He actually used the phrase “getting his bell rung.” Seriously??  It’s poor form to use that phrase these days. He then went on to say, “This is football. This isn’t volleyball or baseball…” which implies that playing with a head injury should be the norm in football.

Statements like his make me cringe. I can’t believe this train of thought still occurs, especially with the recent suicides of retired NFL players and the impressive research regarding CTE. I really can’t believe that ESPN would interview a guy like Romanowski, given his obvious ignorance about concussion management.  I understand his compulsion to respond to Carter’s allegation. And I understand that he played in a different time. It was okay to play “with your bell rung” in his days. But to still speak of it so callously? As they say on Monday Night Countdown, “Come on, man!”

Just as concerning were Derrick Mason’s comments on Outside The Lines on the very same day. “I don’t worry about concussion or head trauma as much at a younger age, because these kids don’t generate as much force as NFL players.” Clearly he doesn’t understand that kids are more susceptible and that their developing brains are much different than those of adults. I’m not saying that all NFL players, current and retired, should understand every aspect of concussion assessment, management, etc., but I do think that ESPN should be more careful about these interviews. Someone watching this show, who doesn’t understand much about concussion, may listen to Mason’s comments and believe them. What if a young father takes Mason’s comments to his son’s Pee Wee football game? To Mason’s credit, he believes that if a player is questionable for a concussion, he should sit out at least two games, no questions asked. At least something is sinking in.

This stuff is dangerous, and we need to be careful about what information is put out there for people to see and hear. It’s a hot topic right now. As a sports medicine professional, I’ll be the first to admit that we still have a lot of work to do before we fully understand concussion and all it involves. The good news is that this issue has become more well-known and discussed. I just hope the discussion doesn’t involve Bill Romanowski anymore.

Brian Wilson’s injury

“Structural damage.” Don’t you just love how specific the injury reports are when you’re trying to find out what’s wrong with your favorite player? This term was used to describe what was seen on pitcher Brian Wilson’s recent elbow MRI, after missing time last season and struggling with his velocity early already this season. I’ve read plenty of MRI interpretations by musculoskeletal radiologists – some very detailed, but some not – and I can promise you that none of them are that vague. A term like “structural damage” can open the doors to some speculation, but Wilson has become more vocal about his elbow problems over the last 24 hours. It’s pretty clear at this point what’s going on, but let me first explain the basics.

The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) in the elbow is the critical structure that resists valgus stress in the elbow. When a pitcher is in the cocking phase of the pitch, this ligament is under a great deal of stress. Unfortunately, it’s often too much stress, especially in one with bad pitching mechanics. The ligament weakens over time and eventually ruptures. The pitcher describes the feeling as a pop or tear, and there can be associated numbness and tingling in the 4th and 5th fingers, secondary to the close proximity of the ulnar nerve to the UCL. Unfortunately, the only proven treatment for this is a repair. The surgeon uses another ligament (usually the palmar ligament in the wrist or the hamstring) to reconstruct the UCL. This is what is known as Tommy John surgery, and Brian Wilson underwent this surgery already while pitching in college. The rehab after the surgery is long and tenuous, but fortunately most pitchers recover well and can return to throwing and pitching about 12-18 months after the procedure. However, pitching mechanics must be addressed, because continuing bad habits will set one up for another injury, if not the same one again.

Regarding his MRI findings, which we can assume indicate another UCL injury, Wilson sounds upbeat about the injury, saying, “I’m doing fine. I’m not down at all. This is an opportunity for me to get a better arm. Why is that disappointing? I get to throw harder. I like it. I like my odds.” He is referring to the fact that pitchers feel stronger when they come back from Tommy John surgery. There is not much science to back that up, but the thought is that the pitcher’s velocity and control slowly diminish as the ligament weakens, so after it has been repaired, the pitching improves.

Unfortunately for Wilson, assuming he has torn his UCL again, is that the odds of a return after a second repair are not in his favor. In this article :http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/2007-07-18-tommy-john_N.htm, Dr. James Andrews estimates the success of a second Tommy John surgery as 20%. In case you don’t know, Dr. Andrews is THE guy in orthopedics when it comes to UCL injuries, and Wilson plans on consulting with him soon.

Now, let’s assume that “structural damage” means a partial tear. Are there other options? Sure. I’d recommend PRP to start the healing process and see how he does over time. Maybe “structural damage” means injury to the cartilage of the bones in the elbow. He could consider a variety of injections to help with pain relief. Given the second and third hand information we get from the media, it’s difficult to say with 100% certainty whether or not Wilson will return to pitching. You have to give the guy credit for his positive outlook and respectable work ethic. However, in my humble opinion, it doesn’t look good. At least he’s got an endorsement deal. Yo quiero UCL?

Djokovic: a star at the age of 5

Last night I was watching a piece on CBS’s 60 Minutes about Novak Djokovic. He certainly has an interesting story to tell, and there’s no doubt he’s more entertaining than many of the stars in the game of tennis right now. I don’t want to downplay the war in Serbia, or how Djokovic did not lose his focus through endless bombings and everything that he and his family had to endure. But the one thing about the show that really stuck with me (aside from the fact that his English is better than most Americans on Facebook) is what his old coach had to say: “I told his parents he was a golden child… I told them he would be the best in the world.” At that time, when she knew he was a born champion, Djokovic was 5 and a half years old.

I’ve written before about overzealous parents. I’ve also written about Timmy burning out on his sport at an early age because someone thinks he’s going to be the next big thing and makes him play endlessly. So I won’t beat a dead horse. But here’s the point, plain and simple: if your kid’s got talent, you’ll know it. And you won’t need travel teams, summer leagues, and expensive coaches to help you figure it out. You’ll just know it.

Shoulder pain

Shoulder pain is a common complaint. In fact, I’d estimate that it is one of the most common complaints I see. In most cases, the diagnosis is rotator cuff (not “cup”) strain or tendinopathy. The good news is, most of the time, it’s non-operative. That means it likely won’t require surgery. It also does not require an MRI for the diagnosis, contrary to common belief.

First, let me review the anatomy in basic terms. The shoulder joint is a ball and socket joint. The socket is very shallow, which allows for the great range of motion we have in the shoulder. However, this makes the role of the rotator cuff critical. The rotator cuff is made up of four tendons, and these tendons stabilize the humeral head (top of the arm bone) in the shallow shoulder joint. When these tendons as a group are weak or not working properly, other structures become impinged, causing pain. I must also mention the scapular stabilizers (trapezius muscles, rhomboids, etc.) here. In addition to the rotator cuff, these muscles are critical for normal shoulder motion because the glenoid, or the “socket” part of the joint, is actually part of the scapula, or shoulder blade. Often times scapular motion suffers as a result of shoulder pain, but it also commonly contributes to the discomfort. Over time the muscles and tendons can become weak or imbalanced as a result of overuse or poor mechanics. This results in a tendinopathy, or prolonged injury to the tendons.

When evaluating shoulder pain, I assess range of motion and strength of the rotator cuff, in addition to some special testing. The history, physical exam, and x-rays often tell me what I need to know, without having to rely on advanced imaging. Many of my patients think they need an MRI to rule out a rotator cuff tear, and sadly, some physicians will order one automatically when they hear “shoulder pain.” Here’s the thing: the likelihood of a rotator cuff tear increases as we age. And like I said, the physical exam can tell us a lot. So if I see a 25 year old male with gradual onset of pain who demonstrates good range of motion and strength on exam, I am not suspicious for a full-thickness tear. However, if I see a 65 year old female with severe pain after a fall or other trauma, I am more suspicious for a tear, and I will order the MRI to evaluate.

The good news is, young to middle-aged folks respond very well to conservative treatment and rehab (which usually involves physical therapy). Re-training the rotator cuff muscles and tendons, in addition to the scapular stabilizers, is critical to the treatment plan. This isn’t something that gets better overnight, but it should improve with time as the shoulder mechanics improve.

The treatment of rotator cuff tears is not always so simple. Full-thickness tears are quite painful and will not heal on their own, requiring a surgical repair. However, many partial-thickness tears can be treated conservatively. While they won’t heal, per se, they will “quiet down” and become less painful over time. Unfortunately, there is no way to predict which partial-thickness tears will progress to full-thickness tears and which ones will become less troublesome.

Of course, there are exceptions to the rule, and I won’t belabor those points here. It would require another post to address injuries specific to throwing athletes, another to address instability in the shoulder, and another to address injuries of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. So that’s it for now. When in doubt, see a sports medicine physician who understands common pathology in the shoulder and can make appropriate treatment recommendations based on your particular problem.

10 tips on concussions

1. There is a very real risk of death if an adolescent athlete returns to play too soon after a concussion.
2. Despite this (among other scary statistics), kids are still not reporting their symptoms. If you are a parent of an adolescent athlete, please talk to him or her about the long-term complications of “playing through it.”
3. Chronic symptoms include, but are not limited to, persistent headaches, visual disturbances, imbalance, emotional lability, depression, anxiety, and difficulties with concentration and cognition. Think about your child not being able to get a college degree or hold down a steady job because he didn’t want to sit out a week or two of practice in high school football.
4. There is no such thing as a concussion-proof helmet. Period.
5. If you find yourself saying an athlete “got his bell rung,” shame on you. Welcome to 2012.
6. Not all physicians fully understand concussion management.
7. In order to return to play, an athlete must rest and become symptom-free.
8. After that, he or she must demonstrate a return to baseline on neurocognitive testing.
9. After that, he or she must complete a gradual, exertional return to play protocol without having recurrence of symptoms.
10. There are no exceptions.

Ultrasound – it’s not just for moms and babies

Musculoskeletal ultrasound is quickly becoming more popular within the sports medicine world. Many physicians in this field, including physiatrists, primary care providers, and orthopedic surgeons are increasingly attending courses and utilizing this imaging modality in their practices. However, sometimes when I explain to a patient that I’m going to use ultrasound for a diagnostic test or to guide my needle during an injection, he or she asks, “ultrasound… like ultrasound that’s used for babies?” To which I respond, “Yes, it’s like that ultrasound. Except we use it for a different purpose.”

The purpose of this post is to educate the reader on the benefits of musculoskeletal ultrasound. It has become an attractive option for physicians in terms of diagnosing tendon, ligament, and nerve disorders. It is also useful for guidance for interventional procedures. For example, until recently, a patient who required an injection into the hip joint would have to have this done under fluoroscopy, meaning with x-ray guidance. This would require scheduling a time with the radiology department and being exposed to the radiation more than once while the needle was being positioned. Now, however, a physician experienced in ultrasound-guided procedures can do this quickly in the office. This is just one example. Allow me to briefly point out the benefits of ultrasound versus other imaging modalities.

1. The patient is not exposed to radiation.
2. There are no contra-indications (for example, patients with pacemakers cannot undergo MRI testing).
3. Portability means easier access. For example, the machine I use is fairly lightweight and looks like a large laptop computer. I can easily take it from one office to another, or to an athletic arena.
4. It can be used for dynamic imaging. If you have a tendon that subluxates (or displaces) with movement, this can be seen on ultrasound, whereas with MRI, the patient needs to be still.
5. It is incredibly useful for needle guidance with procedures. See above for one example. There are many published studies indicating increased accuracy with ultrasound-guided procedures compared with “blind” procedures (those without image guidance).
6. The physician has immediate feedback. For example, I don’t need to rely on a radiologist’s interpretation of the test I ordered. If I’m the one seeing the patient, and I can perform the ultrasound, nothing is lost in translation. Also, I don’t have to wait for the report.

Of course, there are disadvantages. Ultrasound is not useful for identifying anything within the bones or deep within joints. Its use is limited to more superficial structures; deeper structures are more difficult to see. Last, but certainly not least, it that ultrasound imaging is only as good as its user, meaning the more experience the physician has with the ultrasound machine, the better.

As I mentioned previously, there are many courses available for physicians to attend to increase their knowledge and skill with musculoskeletal ultrasound. While certification for musculoskeletal ultrasound is not currently available, planning for a certification examination is currently underway.

Accountability and Health Care

Accountability.
According to Merriam-Webster.com, the definition is this: the quality or state of being accountable. especially : an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one’s actions.

I feel as though society completely lacks accountability these days. I believe this to be true in many aspects of life – financially, socially, morally, among others – but since I’ve been involved with health care for my entire adult life, this is what I’ll address today. In my opinion, many American adults do not hold themselves accountable for their own health and well being.

I first saw it in medical school. I didn’t understand why patients with peripheral vascular disease or diabetes simply wouldn’t at least try to quit smoking or walk a few times a week for exercise. “I can’t afford Chantix (smoking cessation medication),” they’d say. “Well it’s less than what you’re spending per week on cigarettes,” I’d say. “But my husband loves donuts, so I have to buy them,” they’d say. “Well, try to eat something else,” I’d say. You can see why it didn’t take long before I was banging my head against the wall. The worst part about it was spending so much time and effort on patient education and lifestyle modification, only for the next question to be, “Can’t I just take a pill for that?”

Fine, I thought. I just won’t go into primary care. Sports medicine is where it’s at! Everyone loves treating athletes. However, going into sports medicine is more like going into musculoskeletal medicine. A lot of people, not just athletes, have knee pain or shoulder pain. And some of those people come see me. As time goes on I’m starting to realize that a significant percentage of those patients want one of three things: an MRI, a cortisone injection, or pain medicine. Sometimes all three. Problem is, they don’t know why! “I think I need an MRI.” Really? Why’s that? “Well, I don’t know… my sister-in-law had shoulder pain and her doctor ordered an MRI.” Gee, thanks. They didn’t teach me that part about doing what everyone else is doing when I was in med school.

I also have a “friend” with recurrent abdominal pain, cause unknown despite multiple lab tests and imaging. “The doctors have no idea what’s going on,” she says with disgust. She has a long-standing, skeptical view of medicine and doctors. Despite the fact that I am, in fact, a doctor, she asked for my advice. Should she see another specialist or seek another diagnostic test? “Well, that depends – can you tell me what tests have already been done?” I asked. “Um, I think a CT scan, some labs, I’m not really sure.” Here’s an idea – why don’t you take charge of your health, be accountable for what’s going on with your body, then we’ll talk. The first step in diagnosis is to get a good history, which is the patient’s account of what’s going on. It’s difficult to establish a diagnosis without a good history.

I think the finest example of this lack of accountability was in a middle aged female I saw recently for knee pain. She had seen one of my colleagues 6 months prior, at which time conservative treatment was recommended for her, including weight loss, as she weighed in at 300 lbs. We worked her into the schedule because she was having such horrible pain. I soon discovered that she had seen another physician the previous day, who had given her a cortisone injection. She had no relief, hence, her visit with me. I also discovered that she had in fact gained weight over the last 6 months, and had not done any of the recommended exercises for at least 3 months. When asked about this, I was given every excuse in the book about why this was the case. I was also interrupted several times by her husband, who took a defensive stance on the weight loss subject. Let me assure the reader that I was in no way hurtful with this conversation, but matter-of-fact. There is evidence to support the recommendation of weight loss for knee health. I emphasized the simple fact that her knee would not feel any better if she did not lose the weight. The visit ended with her asking me to give her pain medication and… wait for it… a note for bedrest!!
Why is it that so many patients just want a quick fix? If your (insert body part here) hurts badly enough that you took time out of your day to seek your doctor’s advice, why can’t you take the time out of your day to do what your doctor recommends? Are your health and well-being not worth the effort? And if I recommend physical therapy instead of a surgical consult, why are you disappointed? I’m so confused by this. I kid you not, I’ve heard a patient speak these words: “Are you kidding?!? Just physical therapy? I just want back surgery!!” Can’t make this stuff up.

Don’t get me wrong, most of my patients are very compliant and pro-active when it comes to their health. It’s just that subset of patients who want the easy way out, no matter what the diagnosis is. I think that as a society, we need to learn to be accountable for what we do, financially, socially, and personally. My recommendation for patients is to keep track of everything – if you had a cortisone injection, remember when it was and why it was given. Keep a list of medications. Obtain a copy of any imaging (CT scans, MRIs, etc.) for your own records. I also (strongly) suggest following the recommendations that are given to you by your physician. For example, try the physical therapy – just because it doesn’t relieve your pain overnight doesn’t mean it’s not worthwhile. You might find that when you participate in your own health care, it works out in your favor. After all, if you don’t take care of yourself, why should you expect someone else to do so?

How much is too much when it comes to sports?

This past weekend, I lectured in a local Little League coaches’ clinic. Between me and the other lecturer, we presented topics such as injury prevention, management of acute injuries on the field, and overuse injuries. I was a little nervous at first to be “the bad guy” lecturing on limiting pitch counts, etc. in order to prevent overuse injuries in these adolescent baseball players. We know that as kids are playing year-rounds sports these days, they are at higher risk for certain elbow and shoulder injuries, especially those that involve the growth plates. Overuse leads to injury. The coaches had to attend this clinic; it wasn’t voluntary. I was sure the first thing on their mind wasn’t elbow pain but how to win games. What I ended up seeing, however, was a real concern on the coaches’ behalf for the same issues. When I asked for questions from the audience at the end, instead I received comments such as “You know, it’s usually the parents that ignore the pitch counts.” Or “We limit throwing in practice according to the guidelines, but the dads continue to throw with the kids when they’re at home.” Now, we’ve all seen or heard about those fanatical parents who have little Billy in every league possible, bragging about how he’s got the best batting average on his team in all 4 leagues. They think little Billy is going to be the next A-Rod. Guess what, folks? He probably won’t be. But try telling that to mom and dad. No, seriously, try. Because they won’t listen to me.

I frequently have this discussion with my fiancé, who played professional baseball for almost 5 years. The interesting thing is that he didn’t play on a travel league until he was 17. As an adolescent, he didn’t play year-round, and his parents didn’t pay hundreds of dollars for a biomechanical evaluation of his swing. He didn’t field grounders all night long because he dreamed of a multi-million dollar deal one day. He did it because he loved it. I reminded my sister of this last year when she was hauling her two sons (then ages 8 and 10) around to baseball games for different leagues all weekend. In addition to their summer “optimist” league, they were playing in a travel league, complete with personalized bat bags and helmets. Lo and behold, one of them got burnt out on the sport. Now he doesn’t play at all. I can’t imagine how much more quickly that would have happened if he were playing year-round like these kids in south Florida.

Which leads me to ask, why? Why are these kids playing year round at such an early age? Why are they throwing so much without giving their arms time to rest? Do they love it that much? Do mom and dad tell them this is how they’re going to get ahead? Do they really think they’re giving little Billy the chance to earn millions one day? At the end of the day, a child’s talent is going to manifest itself on its own. If Billy has natural talent, it won’t matter if he starts playing at age 13 versus age 6. It won’t matter if he has the best coaches or the best equipment, because you can’t coach power and you can’t coach speed. What does matter is the rising number of overuse injuries we’re seeing in these adolescent athletes. Their growing bodies are simply not made to withstand the physical stresses they are experiencing. Long-term data is forthcoming, but this is what I’d like to see: how many of these kids who have an overuse injury during their growing years actually end up playing in the big leagues? My educated guess is not many. But until parents understand that, their children will continue to suffer needless injuries chasing that dream.

The Mediterranean Diet

As I mentioned in a previous post, I do not advocate for any one diet or another. I do enjoy most things in moderation, and I’m not a big fan of depriving yourself of things you really enjoy. However, I have recently been asked about the Mediterranean diet, and while I don’t adhere to it strictly, it has a good basis. I’ll explain why.

First of all, it’s not so much a diet as it is a pattern. It’s about choosing low-risk fats over high-risk fats, and it emphasizes exercise. There is also emphasis on foods that are rich in antioxidants – think anti-aging, anti-inflammatory, super troopers that have even been suggested to prevent brain aging. The Mediterranean diet has been linked with a significant reduction of mortality due to cardiovascular events, stroke, and cancer, as well as reduction in the incidence of diabetes, high cholesterol, metabolic syndrome, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease.  Here are the highlights:

Fish – cardioprotective due to omega-3 fatty acids, and it’s a good source of protein. Red meats and certain dairy products are high in saturated fat, which has been linked to cardiovascular disease, especially in smokers.

Olives and olive oil – rich in antioxidants and monounsaturated or low-risk fats, as opposed to butter or margarine

Vegetables and fruits  – high in fiber and rich in antioxidants

Spices/herbs  – instead of salt, which increases risk of high blood pressure and stomach cancer

Nuts , seeds, whole grains – high in protein, fiber, and low-risk fats

As you can see, this does not include processed foods and carbohydrates, so it is not your typical American diet. I think what the diet doesn’t include is just as important as what it does include. You might be saying, “If I adopt this type of dietary plan, it’s going to cost me.” This is true.  But think about it this way – you could eat cheaper, processed foods full of carbs, fats and sugars NOW and then pay more for medications, procedures, and hospital stays LATER. Am I being dramatic? Maybe. But if your health isn’t worth the investment, then what is?